Validation of the Russian Version of the Prolapse Quality-of-life Questionnaire and its Application to Assess the Impact of Pelvic Organ Prolapse on Quality of Life and the Effect of Treatment in Women Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to validate the translated Russian version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire and test its applicability to assess the impact of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on QoL and the effect of treatment in women undergoing reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Following a forward- and back-translation of the original English P-QOL questionnaire into Russian, the translated questionnaire was reviewed by a group of patients as well as an expert panel. Women with POP who were admitted to a university hospital for reconstructive surgery were recruited. All the women completed the P-QoL questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaires before surgery. Clinical data and POP Quantification (POP-Q) Index according to the International Continence Society were obtained. Psychometric properties of the questionnaire were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 303 women with POP were included in the study. Most patients presented with POP-Q >2. The P-QoL questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties. High internal consistency was shown in all domains (Cronbach's alpha coefficient from 0.65 to 0.92). The test-retest reliability confirmed a highly significant stability between the total scores for each domain. Significant correlations of the P-QoL domains with the PFDI-20 and SF-36 scales (p < 0.05) were obtained, demonstrating satisfactory convergent validity. Discriminative construct validity was proved by the differences in the mean scores for P-QoL domains across POP-Q stages (p < 0.05): general health perceptions, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations and severity measures were significantly higher for POP-Q stages 3 and 4 than for POP-Q stage 2 (p < 0.01); general health perceptions and severity measures were higher for POP-Q stage 4 than for POP-Q stage 3 (p < 0.05); sleep/energy was higher for POP-Q stage 3 than for POP-Q stage 2 (p < 0.05). Significant improvement of QoL in the 2 months after surgery (p < 0.05) indicated that the P-QoL questionnaire is sensitive to change. CONCLUSIONS: The Russian version of the P-QoL questionnaire is characterized by appropriate psychometric properties. The P-QoL questionnaire is a useful tool for describing the QoL profile in women with POP before reconstructive surgery and evaluating treatment outcomes after the procedure.

Tunable tension tape versus transobturator tape in treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: Randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The synthetic mid-urethral slings are currently considered to be the most widely used technique for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The most challenging aspect of the existing approaches is to achieve the optimal tension of the sling which treatment results are directly dependent on. To solve this problem, sling systems enabling an adjustment of the tension in the early postoperative period were created. A comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of such a system and a nonadjustable sling seems to be a relevant task. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial enrolled 320 patients with a mean age of 55.2 ± 11.2 years and confirmed SUI. Patients were randomized into two groups: the first group underwent a standard synthetic suburethral sling (transobturator tape [TOT]) procedure and the second group underwent a tunable tension tape sling (TTT) procedure. All patients underwent stress test, uroflowmetry and ultrasound scan to determine the postvoid residual volume. Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form 6, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire 12 questionnaires were used to assess subjective efficacy. RESULTS: Enhancement of prosthesis tension in the second group was required in 44 (28%) patients. Due to the possibility of tightening of the sling in the early postoperative period, the operation was effective in 143 (89%) patients in the adjustable sling group and in 109 (68%) patients in Group 1, p < 0.001. Loosening of the sling tension was performed in 25 (16%) patients in Group 2. The signs of obstructive voiding symptoms at the follow-up time of 36 months remained in Group 1 in 13 (8%) patients. Subjective satisfaction with treatment on the PGI-I scale was higher in Group 2: 100 (62%) versus 132 (82%), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: A synthetic mid-urethral TTT is superior to a standard nonadjustable sling in long-term effectiveness and safety.